Disclaimer


This is an "UNOFFICIAL" source of information for Mechanics and Related covered by the United Airlines CBA as represented by the IBT. Nothing on this blog should be considered as an official position or opinion of any Officer or Agent of the International or any Local. The opinions expressed here are the authors only.


Negotiation Committee Members:

Mitch Hunt - DEN

Dave Mahood - EWR

Blake Silverstein - IAD

Dexter Thomas - IAH

Scott Stoddart - LAX

Paul Becerra - MCO

Mike Pecoraro - ORD

Joseph Prisco - SFO

John Laurin - SFO

December 30th 2022

re Time to update your information

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

We are currently working with BallotPoint to ensure that the ratification vote will take place before the end of January. As soon as the timeline is formalized it will be shared with you here and on the website as well as through your Locals. What I would ask from you, is to please make sure your mailing address is updated with your Local. If you’re unsure who to contact at the Local, please reach out to your Chief steward or Business Agent for help. Time is of the essence in this matter.

Fraternally

Vinny Graziano

Airline Division Representative

Facebook|YouTube|Instagram

 

Negotiation Committee Members:

Mitch Hunt - DEN

Dave Mahood - EWR

Blake Silverstein - IAD

Dexter Thomas - IAH

Scott Stoddart - LAX

Paul Becerra - MCO

Mike Pecoraro - ORD

Joseph Prisco - SFO

John Laurin - SFO

December 28, 2022

Increased outsourcing of narrowbody A Check work

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

There is a rumor circulating that the modified provisions of Article 1.B.11 in the extension agreement would include A Check work. For purposes of the CBA, A Check work was never considered heavy maintenance under that provision, and as you will see in the email exchange below, that work would still not be considered heavy maintenance if the extension ratifies.

The order of the exchange is from bottom up.

Fraternally,

Vinny Graziano

Airline Division Representative

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From:Reardon, Thomas - LR

To:vgraziano

Cc:rcfisher7

Wed, Dec 28 at 12:30 PM

 

Vinny,

I concur with your characterization of “A”-check work as not considered heavy maintenance under the current terms of Article1.B.11, and that characterization does not change under the terms of the extension agreement.

Best Regards,

Tom

Thomas Reardon (he/him/his)

Managing Director, Labor Relations - Ground

United | Corporate Support Center | 233 S. Wacker Drive WHQLR 28th Floor | Chicago, IL 60606

 

From: Vinny Graziano
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2022 9:02 AM
To: Reardon, Thomas - LR
Cc: rcfisher7
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Heavy Check/MX

This message was sent from outside of United Airlines. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the content is safe.

Hi Tom,

This will confirm our discussion that narrowbody A-Check work has not been traditionally considered heavy maintenance under the provisions of Article 1.B.11, and that further, such A-Check work would not be considered heavy maintenance under the terms agreed to in the extension agreement. If you agree with the above could please respond with your concurrence.

Regards,

Vinny Graziano

Facebook|YouTube|Instagram


Negotiation Committee Members: 

Mitch Hunt - DEN 

Dave Mahood - EWR 

Blake Silverstein - IAD 

Dexter Thomas - IAH 

Scott Stoddart - LAX 

Paul Becerra - MCO 

Mike Pecoraro - ORD 

Joseph Prisco - SFO 

John Laurin - SFO 

December 20th 2022, 

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

It has been brought to my attention that a misinterpretation of the scope change in the extension agreement has been circulating. To be clear, the change to scope allowing narrowbody heavy maintenance work to be performed overseas, without IBT consent, applies only to the work the company has historically outsourced under Article 1.B. paragraph 11, and which has to this point been accomplished at MROs in North America. This is not an expansion of the company’s ability to further outsource work, and only applies to heavy maintenance as described in the new, if ratified, Article 1.B. paragraph 11. In order for other covered work to be subject to further outsourcing, the other paragraphs in Scope would need similar changes, and there are no modifications to any provision in the Article besides 1. B. paragraph 11.

Currently, the CBA only protects one line of heavy maintenance. That protection in the TA has now increased to two lines, to capture the line created from the recent Arbitration ruling issued regarding overseas narrowbody maintenance. The arbitrator granted the line for one year, but it is now added as a permanent line in LOA #3 if the TA passes. The work of this line will be performed by A&P Technicians, period. Apprentices will be assigned to learn only, not perform this work, or the work on two lines as the current rumor states. In addition, if the company avails themselves of the new provision in Article 1.B. paragraph 11, they must then protect an additional 4 heavy maintenance lines, whether that be mod work, AD work or heavy check work. This is a significant expansion of our current heavy maintenance scope and does not detract or diminish in any way from any current protections for this membership’s job security.

Hopefully that clears up the misconceptions that are being discussed on the floor.

In solidarity,

Vinny Graziano

Airline Division Representative

International Brotherhood of Teamsters